RSS Feed
 |
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
Hideaway Stash
Question about Hamilton's Hideaway stash in fallout 3?
Can I somehow get the key for Hamilton's Hideaway stash off Three Dog, without pickpocketing, and do the Galaxy News Radio quest so I get the achievement.
No you can't;
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Caching_in_with_Three_Dog
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
|
 | BIG BLACK MARKER~DIVERSION SAFE~ MONEY HIDEAWAY~STASH |  |  | US $8.50 | 18d 1h 48m |
 | Secret stash flair pen-works!-hideaway compartment-SAFE | | | US $12.50 | 4d 9h 26m |
 | Secret Stash Pringles Can Hideaway Diversion Safe Hide | | | US $15.50 | 27d 11h 54m |
 | Hideaway compartment diversion safe stash secret personal private hidden | | | US $15.50 | 23d 11h 50m |
 | NEW Coffee Mug Diversion Safe Hidden Stash Hide Away | | | US $14.99 | 7h 8m |
 | Hideaway compartment-diversion safe~stash-secret-personal~private | | | US $12.50 | 23d 11h 34m |
 | Hideaway compartment diversion safe stash secret personal private | | | US $12.50 | 23d 11h 33m |
 | brush comb STASH SAFE BRUSH SAFE HIDE AWAY BRUSH SAFE | | | US $24.99 | 23d 9h 43m |
 | BLACK AND COLORED DIVERSION SAFE~ MONEY HIDEAWAY~STASH | | | US $7.50 | 22d 6h 3m |
| Powered by phpBay Pro |
|
No items matching your keywords were found.
| | Hideaway $10.49 Hideaway |
| | COUNTRY HIDEAWAY $41.25 COUNTRY HIDEAWAY |
| | Essex Hideaway $11.49 Essex Hideaway |
| | Stash $12.48 No Synopsis Available |
| Account limit of 2104 requests per hour exceeded. |
Fallout 3 - Three Dog's Stash
Storage Cabinets In Your Kitchen
Pegboard Drawer
Instead of having to heft plates onto hard- to-reach overhead you can stack them securely between adjustable pegs (round or triangular) in this 12-inch-deep base cabinet drawer. An added bonus: The kids have no excuse not to help unload the dishwasher.
Flip-Top Cabinet
If you've got a little empty wall space, why not put it to use with a stylish stand-alone cabinet? Because this one tapers at the bottom, it can be mounted lower than a standard cabinet, providing easy-to-reach shelving above a sink or countertop. It also works over a kitchen desk for holding pens, paper, cookbooks, and other miscellany.
Two-Tiered Pot Holder
Pot lids are a problem. They take up too much space and tend to clang around in a most annoying fashion. These deep-on-the-bottom, shallow- on-top base cabinet drawers easily accommodate large stockpots and their notoriously unwieldy lids. The top shelf is also a good spot for those large utensils that get tangled in narrow drawers.
Hideaway Bins
Bulky plastic bags of rice, dried beans, or unpopped popcorn typically live slumped up against canned goods in wall-mounted cabinets or in the pantry, taking up space and, if not well sealed, spilling all over. This "condiment drawer" has a wood insert with covered stainless steel bins for storing grains and spices. You can also pop out the bins and use them as serving trays.
Cool Storage
Aside from adding visual texture, these wire-mesh-fronted cabinet drawers allow air to circulate, so you can use them to stash onions, potatoes, flour, and other items that require a cool, dark place.
Pullout Pilaster
One of the most under-utilized spaces in many kitchens is the gap between cabinets and appliances such as the dishwasher or range. Here, a pullout pilaster conceals a rack for hanging dish towels; similar pullouts can also be fitted with shelves for spices or hooks for oven mitts. Besides, everyone loves a secret hiding place.
About the Author
Posted in 
Tags: 
I accepted at the start that this had to be an inside job.But who? someone who happened on a file or directory being complied by someone for some nefarious purpose? or compiled by the leaker?This analysis has been very insightful but doesn’t really answer who compiled it, when and why.I have to suspect that this folder was carefully managed for leaking. Why?Because, suppose I am a researcher at UEA and I want to hide stuff from FOI disclosure. This is a pretty serious action and I’d try everything else first, as is evidently the implications, nobble the UEA FOI officer, and so on. Only as the position becomes desperate enough would I start deleting stuff but I might choose to simply move any incriminating or sensitive material to a new directory somewhere that can be retrieved when the problem has passed or if necessry to avoid going to jail “Oh, I’ve just found it all. Don’t know how it got there but you know what filing is like.”But if that were the case, I’d just go through all my material and just move anything and everything suspect over to the hideaway stash. I wouldn’t spend time filtering it.You might argue that that is what we have but I suggest it is not.Why? because we only have single copies of emails with multiple replies embedded in them which means only a copy was selected that had the replies. Originals or copies in the inbox with earlier replies don’t seem to appear. If I was creating a stash it wouldn’t matter that I had collected all versions in there – disc space is not a problem, time is. Time to selectively save and selectively delete. only had the most complete copy.That suggests to me that someone took care to compile this, someone familiar enough to know what to include and what not and with the time to do it.I suspect anyone discovering a hideaway folder would probably have sneek preview and then release pretty much all of it as it stood and as quickly as possible so as not to have copies on machines subject to inspection (an insider leaking).So it still begs the question as to who compiled the folder, under what circumstances and did they go through afterwards and trim out a lot of fat and if so why? It makes me think that some one was careful and familiar enough and with time enough when selecting emails only to include the latest copy with the most replies.It raises the question as to the purpose of the folder again and I am not convinced it is simply a hideaway folder for incriminating stuff under FOI in case they need to produce it to stay out of jail, say. In here we might have found the missing raw data, for example. all safe together.I don’t know how true duplicate email thing is, I didn’t read all of the emails but the searchable website suggests it is so e.g. search for Phil Jones and we don’t find it there.I also don’t know how significant this is. I may be reaching.So the nature of the emails in there requires a bit of thought to create a realistic scenario that accounts not just for what is in there but what is not and while some could be eliminated as obviously private and some as unrelated, why only the copies with the most replies?If we can aanswer that, we might know something more.Since its release there are probably few corners as yet unexamined though the implications of some of that stuff has yet to be fully developed but we probably shouldn’t expect more.On the other hand, if complied with a view to leaking, and carefully compiled by someone with sufficient knowledge to know already what is significant, then it would have to be that much of what is there has been carefully selected and the possibility that whoever did it was familiar enough with the material to appreciate the significance of the individual items does argue that some of the most damaging has yet to be released. If so then what is to be released will probably be released near the end of Copenhagen and will probably be material that won’t be too voluminous and won’t require too much evaluation for the full import to be appreciated within a day or so.Of course, I could just be indulging in wishful thinking and hoping for more and more dramatic revelations… and if a carefully planned release by some one with time to sift through the docs and with sufficient knowledge to appreciate all that was contained, then I’d have to suspect a new release soon.